HC 450 Herzing University Create the Ehr Vision5-B Identify the Planning Horizon Other

Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Instructions

  • Review the information provided for an example EHR implementation, including each activity’s duration and predecessor(s):
ActivityDuration (days)Predecessor
ACreate the EHR vision5
BIdentify the planning horizon10A
CObtain buy-in from affected parties30B
DDevelop a financing and acquisition strategy10C
EDevelop functional, data, and technical strategies45C
FConduct vendor selection45D, E
GPlan the EHR implementation15C, E, F
HConduct benefits realization study10A-H
  • Draw the PERT or GANTT chart for this implementation based on the information provided.
  • Indicate the critical path on the PERT or GANTT chart.
  • Your file should be in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat format.
  • Cite all sources in APA format.
  • Submit your PERT or GANTT chart for grading.
  • Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.

Rubric

Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR

Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

10.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Unit 3 Assignment 1 – ONC” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction: In this assignment, we are presented with an example EHR implementation plan and asked to draw a PERT or GANTT chart based on the provided information. We are also asked to indicate the critical path on the chart and submit it in APA format.

Answer:

Activity Duration (days) Predecessor
A Create the EHR vision 5 –
B Identify the planning horizon 10 A
C Obtain buy-in from affected parties 30 B
D Develop a financing and acquisition strategy 10 C
E Develop functional, data, and technical strategies 45 C, F
F Conduct vendor selection 45 D, E
G Plan the EHR implementation 15 C, E, F
H Conduct benefits realization study 10 A, G

Based on the provided information, the PERT chart would look something like this:

[Insert image of PERT chart]

The critical path, which is the longest duration path through the diagram, is A-C-F-E-G-H with a total duration of 150 days. Any delay in this critical path will delay the entire project.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Select one text from the selection below for Essay#1: Article:”China Helped Raise My American Kids, and They Turned Out Fine” by Heather Kaye  published in

Select one text from the selection below for Essay#1: Article:”China Helped Raise My American Kids, and They Turned Out Fine” by Heather Kaye  published in New York Times.   Video: “How AI is generating a revolution in entertainment” published in Youtube by The Economist   Podcast: “Beyoncé, Björk and Donald Trump: What makes divas tick ”

Description Deliverable Length: 3-5 pages Write a brief summary of an intelligence and information-sharing strategy, either by a specific agency or in

Description Deliverable Length: 3-5 pages Write a brief summary of an intelligence and information-sharing strategy, either by a specific agency or in general as it applies to intelligence and information sharing. The summary will identify the following: The strategy The agency behind the strategy The primary goals, objectives, and policies within the strategy

Select one of the topics below:Autonomic computing Grid computing Nanotechnology N-tier client/server architectures On-demand computing Service-oriented

Select one of the topics below: Autonomic computing Grid computing Nanotechnology N-tier client/server architectures On-demand computing Service-oriented architecture (SOA) Storage area networks (SANs) Virtualization Write a research paper on the real-world application of the chosen technology. Your paper should include the type of organization(s) that benefits most from this technology.