HC 450 Herzing Week 2 Elements Used To Evaluate a Decision Support System Report

Unit 2 Assignment 2 – Evaluating DSS

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Instructions

  • Read the following two papers related to the evaluation of clinical DSSs:
    • Berner, E.S., Webster, G.D., Shugerman, A.A., Jackson, J., Algina, J., Baker, A.L., Ball, E.V., Cobbs, G.G., Dennis, V.W., Frenkel, E.P., Hudson, L.D., Mancall, E.L., Rackley, C.E., & Taunton, O.D. (1994, June 23). Performance of four computer-based diagnostic decision support systems. New England Journal of Medicine, 330(25),1792-96. Retrieved from
    • Berner, E.S., Jackson, J.R., & Algina, J. (1996). Relationships among the performance scores of four diagnostic decision support systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 3(3), 208-15. Retrieved from
  • Identify a minimum of four (4) key elements involved in conducting an evaluation of DSS solutions.
  • Submit your report for grading. Your report should be in Microsoft Word format. Cite all sources in APA format.
  • Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.

Rubric

Unit 2 Assignment 2 – Evaluating DSS

Unit 2 Assignment 2 – Evaluating DSS

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

10.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 40.0

Unit 2 Assignment 1 – DSS and Quality” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
In the field of medicine, clinical decision support systems (DSSs) play an important role in aiding healthcare professionals in making accurate and timely diagnoses. Evaluating the performance of such systems is crucial to determine their effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. In this assignment, we will identify four key elements involved in conducting an evaluation of DSS solutions based on two papers related to this topic.

Answer:

1. Selection of appropriate evaluation metrics: To evaluate the performance of a DSS, it is important to select appropriate evaluation metrics based on the intended purpose of the system. Some commonly used metrics include diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

2. Identification of an appropriate reference standard: An appropriate reference standard should be selected to validate the results obtained from the DSS. The reference standard could be a gold standard test or an expert opinion if a gold standard test does not exist. The reference standard must be appropriate and acceptable for the targeted population.

3. Recruitment of an appropriate study population: The study population must be selected based on the purpose of the DSS. In addition, the sample size should be adequate and representative of the targeted population to ensure reliable and generalizable results.

4. Conduct of a prospective clinical study: A prospective clinical study should be conducted to evaluate the performance of the DSS. The study should be designed to compare the results obtained from the DSS with those obtained from the chosen reference standard. Adequate statistical analyses should be carried out to determine the accuracy and reliability of the DSS.

In conclusion, evaluating the performance of clinical decision support systems requires careful consideration of various factors, including appropriate evaluation metrics, identification of an appropriate reference standard, recruitment of an appropriate study population, and the conduct of a prospective clinical study. By addressing these key elements, a comprehensive evaluation of DSS solutions can be achieved.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Select one text from the selection below for Essay#1: Article:”China Helped Raise My American Kids, and They Turned Out Fine” by Heather Kaye  published in

Select one text from the selection below for Essay#1: Article:”China Helped Raise My American Kids, and They Turned Out Fine” by Heather Kaye  published in New York Times.   Video: “How AI is generating a revolution in entertainment” published in Youtube by The Economist   Podcast: “Beyoncé, Björk and Donald Trump: What makes divas tick ”

Description Deliverable Length: 3-5 pages Write a brief summary of an intelligence and information-sharing strategy, either by a specific agency or in

Description Deliverable Length: 3-5 pages Write a brief summary of an intelligence and information-sharing strategy, either by a specific agency or in general as it applies to intelligence and information sharing. The summary will identify the following: The strategy The agency behind the strategy The primary goals, objectives, and policies within the strategy

Select one of the topics below: Autonomic computing Grid computing Nanotechnology N-tier client/server architectures On-demand computing Service-oriented

Select one of the topics below: Autonomic computing Grid computing Nanotechnology N-tier client/server architectures On-demand computing Service-oriented architecture (SOA) Storage area networks (SANs) Virtualization Write a research paper on the real-world application of the chosen technology. Your paper should include the type of organization(s) that benefits most from this technology.