Competency
Modify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.
As part of the clinical portion of your course in your senior semester, you have the opportunity to attend a two-day seminar with senior nursing students from other academic institutions. The theme of this seminar is the application of clinical judgment to determine the best evidence-based solutions for nursing practice.
Instructions:
For a clinical judgment roundtable with faculty and students that is sponsored by your academic institution, you must prepare one scenario based handout to promote robust discussion regarding the application of clinical judgment as an outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs. The handout must contain these components:
Describe a clinical situation where you applied an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning to select what you considered the “best” client intervention based on information available.
Include relevant external and internal cues and hypotheses
Discuss the outcomes based, iterative cycle of clinical reasoning you applied after the initial intervention to select the next “best” interventions appropriate for the particular situation based on client needs.
Rationales and evidence based findings were included to support choices for the next “best” interventions
In Summary
The handout must contained a detailed description of a clinical situation where the student applied an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning to select the “best” client intervention based on information available.
The cycle of clinical reasoning was explained using a complete list of external and internal cues and hypotheses.
Described a detailed, appropriate outcomes-based, iterative cycle of clinical reasoning to select the next “best” interventions appropriate for the particular situation. Provide rationales or evidence-based findings for your choices related to “best” interventions.
The choices were supported by robust rationales and at least one summary of appropriate evidence-based findings.
Do not use 1st person in scholarly writing. Use 3rd person only. APA format. Formal style reflected throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present. Adequate references with adequate in text citation. Please do this assignment using only research published within the past 5 years. Plagiarism free
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The clinical portion of the senior semester presents an opportunity for nursing students to attend a two-day seminar with senior nursing students from other academic institutions. As part of this seminar, students are expected to prepare a scenario-based handout that promotes discussion among faculty and students regarding clinical judgment and the application of evidence-based solutions for nursing practice. The handout must contain detailed descriptions of a clinical situation where an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning was applied to select the best client intervention. This answer will cover the components of the handout and how to meet the requirements.
Answer:
The scenario-based handout for the clinical judgment roundtable should consist of a clinical situation where the application of clinical reasoning and client needs was used to determine the best evidence-based intervention. It should include details of the external and internal cues and hypotheses that were gathered to support the choice of intervention. Also, a complete list of outcomes-based iterations of clinical reasoning should be provided, to show the selection of the best interventions based on the client’s needs. The rationales and evidence-based findings should be used to support the choices made for the intervention.
To ensure that the requirements are met, the student should research current and published research articles within the last five years, in scholarly writing. The APA format should consist of formal style reflected throughout the document, with no errors in spelling, grammar, or APA format. Adequate references with adequate in-text citations should be included in the handout. The use of the third person is essential, and students should avoid using the first person in scholarly writing.
In summary, the handout must contain a detailed description of a clinical situation that involves the application of an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning, with external and internal cues and hypotheses. A detailed list of outcomes-based iterations of clinical reasoning should be provided, with supportive evidence-based rationales and findings for the chosen intervention. Students should pay attention to scholarly writing rules, such as the use of APA format, formal style, and adequate references with in-text citations. Finally, the use of the third person is essential to avoid the use of the first person in scholarly writing.
Expert Solution Preview
Answer:
The scenario-based handout for the clinical judgment roundtable should consist of a clinical situation where the application of clinical reasoning and client needs was used to determine the best evidence-based intervention. It should include details of the external and internal cues and hypotheses that were gathered to support the choice of intervention. Also, a complete list of outcomes-based iterations of clinical reasoning should be provided, to show the selection of the best interventions based on the client’s needs. The rationales and evidence-based findings should be used to support the choices made for the intervention.
To ensure that the requirements are met, the student should research current and published research articles within the last five years, in scholarly writing. The APA format should consist of formal style reflected throughout the document, with no errors in spelling, grammar, or APA format. Adequate references with adequate in-text citations should be included in the handout. The use of the third person is essential, and students should avoid using the first person in scholarly writing.
In summary, the handout must contain a detailed description of a clinical situation that involves the application of an outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning, with external and internal cues and hypotheses. A detailed list of outcomes-based iterations of clinical reasoning should be provided, with supportive evidence-based rationales and findings for the chosen intervention. Students should pay attention to scholarly writing rules, such as the use of APA format, formal style, and adequate references with in-text citations. Finally, the use of the third person is essential to avoid the use of the first person in scholarly writing.